Ayn Rand misquotes William Peterson

06/03/2024 · By Dennis Hackethal · Fork · Check another quote

Original text

That a tiny number, a few hundred out of a student body of more than 27,000, was able to disrupt the campus is the consequence of more than vigor and skill in agitation. This minuscule group could not have succeeded in getting so many students into motion without three other, at times unwitting, sources of support: off-campus assistance of various kinds, the University administration, and the faculty. Everyone who has seen the efficient, almost military, organization of the agitators’ program has a reasonable basis for believing that skilled personnel and money are being dispatched into the Berkeley battle. During demonstrations, the commanders of operations on campus-“in the field,” one might say-kept in touch with FSM headquarters with walkie-talkies. A public information center of the FSM distributed an endless stream of propaganda. When the police arrived in the illegally occupied administration building, the first person arrested was a lawyer well known for left-wing activities. Around the Berkeley community a dozen “ad hoc committees to support” this or that element of the student revolt sprang up spontaneously, as though out of nowhere. The course followed by the University administration-the President, the Chancellor acting under the President’s direction, and all of their various aides-could hardly have better fostered a rebellious student body if it had been devised to do so. To establish dubious regulations and when they are attacked to defend them by unreasonable argument is bad enough; worse still, the University did not impose on the students any sanctions that did not finally evaporate. As Bronislaw Malinowski once remarked, the notion that the “submission of every member of the tribe to its laws” is “instinctive” may be widespread, but it is false; there is no such thing as “automatic acquiescence.” Obedience to norms is developed when it is suitably rewarded, and when noncompliance is suitably punished. That professional educators should need to be reminded of this axiom indicates how deep the roots of the Berkeley crisis lie. But the most important reason that the extremists won so many supporters among the students was the attitude of the faculty. Perhaps their most notorious capitulation to the FSM was a resolution passed by the Academic Senate on December 8, by which the faculty notified the campus not only that they supported all of the radicals’ demands but also that, in effect, they were willing to fight for them against the Board of Regents, should that become necessary. When the resolution passed by an overwhelming majority—824 to 115 votes—it effectively silenced the anti-FSM student organizations.

Quote text

That a tiny number, a few hundred out of a student body of more than 27,000, was able to disrupt the campus is the consequence of more than vigor and skill in agitation. This minuscule group could not have succeeded in getting so many students into motion without three other, at times unwitting, sources of support: off-campus assistance of various kinds, the University administration, and the faculty. Everyone who has seen the efficient, almost military organization of the agitators’ program has a reasonable basis for believing that skilled personnel and money are being dispatched into the Berkeley battle. . . . Around the Berkeley community a dozen “ad hoc committees to support” this or that element of the student revolt sprang up spontaneously, as though out of nowhere. The course followed by the University administration . . . could hardly have better fostered a rebellious student body if it had been devised to do so. To establish dubious regulations and when they are attacked to defend them by unreasonable argument is bad enough; worse still, the University did not impose on the students any sanctions that did not finally evaporate. . . . Obedience to norms is developed when it is suitably rewarded, and when noncompliance is suitably punished. That professional educators should need to be reminded of this axiom indicates how deep the roots of the Berkeley crisis lie. But the most important reason that the extremists won so many supporters among the students was the attitude of the faculty. Perhaps their most notorious capitulation to the F.S.M. was a resolution passed by the Academic Senate on December 8, by which the faculty notified the campus not only that they supported all of the radicals’ demands but also that, in effect, they were willing to fight for them against the Board of Regents, should that become necessary. When that resolution passed by an overwhelming majority—824 to 115 votes—it effectively silenced the anti-F.S.M. student organizations.
Ellipsis used (if any): ‘ . . . ’

Found 9 issue(s) using regular expression . and Histogram algorithm, underlined in wavy red.
Thatatinynumber,afewhundredoutofastudentbodyofmorethan27,000,wasabletodisruptthecampusistheconsequenceofmorethanvigorandskillinagitation.Thisminusculegroupcouldnothavesucceededingettingsomanystudentsintomotionwithoutthreeother,attimesunwitting,sourcesofsupport:off-campusassistanceofvariouskinds,theUniversityadministration,andthefaculty.
Everyonewhohasseentheefficient,almostmilitary,organizationoftheagitators’programhasareasonablebasisforbelievingthatskilledpersonnelandmoneyarebeingdispatchedintotheBerkeleybattle.Duringdemonstrations,thecommandersofoperationsoncampus-“inthefield,”onemightsay-keptintouchwithFSMheadquarterswithwalkie-talkies.ApublicinformationcenteroftheFSMdistributedanendlessstreamofpropaganda.Whenthepolicearrivedintheillegallyoccupiedadministrationbuilding,thefirstpersonarrestedwasalawyerwellknownforleft-wingactivities....AroundtheBerkeleycommunityadozen“*adhoc*committeestosupport”thisorthatelementofthestudentrevoltsprangupspontaneously,asthoughoutofnowhere.
ThecoursefollowedbytheUniversityadministration-thePresident,theChancelloractingunderthePresident’sdirection,andalloftheirvariousaides-...couldhardlyhavebetterfosteredarebelliousstudentbodyifithadbeendevisedtodoso.Toestablishdubiousregulationsandwhentheyareattackedtodefendthembyunreasonableargumentisbadenough;worsestill,theUniversitydidnotimposeonthestudentsanysanctionsthatdidnotfinallyevaporate.AsBronislawMalinowskionceremarked,thenotionthatthe“submissionofeverymemberofthetribetoitslaws”is“instinctive”maybewidespread,butitisfalse;thereisnosuchthingas“automaticacquiescence.”...Obediencetonormsisdevelopedwhenitissuitablyrewarded,andwhennoncomplianceissuitablypunished.ThatprofessionaleducatorsshouldneedtoberemindedofthisaxiomindicateshowdeeptherootsoftheBerkeleycrisislie.
Butthemostimportantreasonthattheextremistswonsomanysupportersamongthestudentswastheattitudeofthefaculty.PerhapstheirmostnotoriouscapitulationtotheF.S.M.wasaresolutionpassedbytheAcademicSenateonDecember8,bywhichthefacultynotifiedthecampusnotonlythattheysupportedalloftheradicals’demandsbutalsothat,ineffect,theywerewillingtofightforthemagainsttheBoardofRegents,shouldthatbecomenecessary.Whentheatresolutionpassedbyanoverwhelmingmajority—824to115votes—iteffectivelysilencedtheanti-F.S.M.studentorganizations.

Explanation

# Part Valid? Explanation
1
Thatatinynumber,afewhundredoutofastudentbodyofmorethan27,000,wasabletodisruptthecampusistheconsequenceofmorethanvigorandskillinagitation.Thisminusculegroupcouldnothavesucceededingettingsomanystudentsintomotionwithoutthreeother,attimesunwitting,sourcesofsupport:off-campusassistanceofvariouskinds,theUniversityadministration,andthefaculty.
Everyonewhohasseentheefficient,almostmilitary
2
,
× no Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘ . . . ’ or [replacement].
3
organizationoftheagitators’programhasareasonablebasisforbelievingthatskilledpersonnelandmoneyarebeingdispatchedintotheBerkeleybattle.
4
Duringdemonstrations,thecommandersofoperationsoncampus-“inthefield,”onemightsay-keptintouchwithFSMheadquarterswithwalkie-talkies.ApublicinformationcenteroftheFSMdistributedanendlessstreamofpropaganda.Whenthepolicearrivedintheillegallyoccupiedadministrationbuilding,thefirstpersonarrestedwasalawyerwellknownforleft-wingactivities.
✓ yes Deletion is followed by a valid insertion.
5
...
✓ yes Insertion is an ellipsis.
6
AroundtheBerkeleycommunityadozen“*adhoc*committeestosupport”thisorthatelementofthestudentrevoltsprangupspontaneously,asthoughoutofnowhere.
ThecoursefollowedbytheUniversityadministration
7
-thePresident,theChancelloractingunderthePresident’sdirection,andalloftheirvariousaides-
✓ yes Deletion is followed by a valid insertion.
8
...
✓ yes Insertion is an ellipsis.
9
couldhardlyhavebetterfosteredarebelliousstudentbodyifithadbeendevisedtodoso.Toestablishdubiousregulationsandwhentheyareattackedtodefendthembyunreasonableargumentisbadenough;worsestill,theUniversitydidnotimposeonthestudentsanysanctionsthatdidnotfinallyevaporate.
10
AsBronislawMalinowskionceremarked,thenotionthatthe“submissionofeverymemberofthetribetoitslaws”is“instinctive”maybewidespread,butitisfalse;thereisnosuchthingas“automaticacquiescence.”
✓ yes Deletion is followed by a valid insertion.
11
...
✓ yes Insertion is an ellipsis.
12
Obediencetonormsisdevelopedwhenitissuitablyrewarded,andwhennoncomplianceissuitablypunished.ThatprofessionaleducatorsshouldneedtoberemindedofthisaxiomindicateshowdeeptherootsoftheBerkeleycrisislie.
Butthemostimportantreasonthattheextremistswonsomanysupportersamongthestudentswastheattitudeofthefaculty.PerhapstheirmostnotoriouscapitulationtotheF
13
.
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
14
S
15
.
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
16
M
17
.
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
18
wasaresolutionpassedbytheAcademicSenateonDecember8,bywhichthefacultynotifiedthecampusnotonlythattheysupportedalloftheradicals’demandsbutalsothat,ineffect,theywerewillingtofightforthemagainsttheBoardofRegents,shouldthatbecomenecessary.Whenth
19
e
× no Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘ . . . ’ or [replacement].
20
at
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
21
resolutionpassedbyanoverwhelmingmajority—824to115votes—iteffectivelysilencedtheanti-F
22
.
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
23
S
24
.
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
25
M
26
.
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
27
studentorganizations.

Please note
  • This tool is in its beta stage. Expect things to break; proceed with caution.
  • This tool isn't magic. It can only catch errors that can be determined programmatically. But quoting properly is also about accurately reflecting the meaning of the quoted content to the reader. That requires an understanding of the content, which is something this site cannot give you. Quoting properly is still your responsibility.
  • Red markings indicate that something was removed in the quote that was present in the original. Conversely, green markings indicate that something added in the quote that wasn't present in the original. Red and green markings don't necessarily error – improper additions and deletions are underlined in wavy red.
  • When no issues are found, that is NOT a guarantee that a quote is not a misquote.
  • Results are not necessarily in line with your styleguide. For example, for ellipses at the end of a sentence, preceding punctuation may or may not be omitted depending on your style guide. Given the following original...
    Tim had dinner, and he enjoyed it.
    ...the quote below will be marked as incorrect because it omits the comma:
    Tim had dinner [...].
    This quote, however, will pass with zero issues:
    Tim had dinner, [...].
    Whether punctuation can be omitted without breaking the meaning the author of the quoted text intended also depends on context and content, so you need to check yourself.
  • Depending on your styleguide, ‘swallowing’ a linebreak with an ellipsis may not be permissible, but this site does permit it.
  • Formatting, such as italics and bold text, is not yet supported. Consequently, changes in formatting cannot be detected. Use something like markdown syntax – *single asterisks for italics*, **double asterisks for bold text**, etc. – to indicate and detect changes in formatting. Pasting from other websites should convert to this syntax automatically. If your quote adds or omits emphasis, be sure to indicate that in your text (eg by saying 'emphasis added' or 'emphasis removed').