David Deutsch misquotes Nick Squires’s Telegraph article

02/12/2024 · By Dennis Hackethal · Fork · Check another quote

Original text

They concluded that the exact shade, texture and depth of the imprints on the cloth could only be produced with the aid of ultraviolet lasers – technology that was clearly not available in medieval times. [...] They concluded that the marks were not made by paints, pigments or dyes and that the image was not "the product of an artist", but that at the same time it could not be explained by modern science.

Quote text

They concluded that the exact shade, texture and depth of the imprints on the cloth could only be produced with the aid of ultraviolet lasers – technology that was clearly not available in medieval times. They concluded that the marks were not made by paints, pigments or dyes and that the image was not “the product of an artist”, but that at the same time it could not be explained by modern science.
No use of ellipsis indicated, falling back to default ‘[...]’ if necessary.

Found 18 issue(s) using regular expression . and Histogram algorithm, underlined in wavy red.
T[Theyconcluded](https://www.teylegraph.co.uk/ncews/religion/8966422/Italian-studey-claims-Turin-Shroud-is-Christs-authentic-burial-robe.html)thattheexactshade,textureanddepthoftheimprintsontheclothcouldonlybeproducedwiththeaidofultravioletlaserstechnologythatwasclearlynotavailableinmedievaltimes.

[...]↵↵Theyconcludedthatthemarkswerenotmadebypaints,pigmentsordyesandthattheimagewasnot"theproductofanartist",butthatatthesametimeitcouldnotbeexplainedbymodernscience.

Explanation

# Part Valid? Explanation
1
T
× no Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement].
2
[Theyconcluded](
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
3
h
4
ttps://www.t
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
5
e
6
y
× no Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement].
7
legraph.
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
8
co
9
.uk/
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
10
n
11
c
× no Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement].
12
ews/re
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
13
l
14
igion/8966422/Italian-st
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
15
ud
16
e
× no Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement].
17
y-claims-Turin-Shrou
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
18
d
19
-is-Christs-authentic-burial-robe.html)
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
20
thattheexactshade,textureanddepthoftheimprintsontheclothcouldonlybeproducedwiththeaidofultravioletlaserstechnologythatwasclearlynotavailableinmedievaltimes.

21
[...]
× no Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement].
22
↵↵
× no Deletions cannot contain linebreaks.
23
Theyconcludedthatthemarkswerenotmadebypaints,pigmentsordyesandthattheimagewasnot
24
"
× no Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement].
25
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
26
theproductofanartist
27
"
× no Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement].
28
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
29
,butthatatthesametimeitcouldnotbeexplainedbymodernscience.

Notes

The original passages corresponding to Deutsch’s quote might be too long to be quoted here under fair use. So I put an ellipsis. It represents several paragraphs. Changing the opening words of the quote to a link to the source isn’t the way to do it. The link should be separate from the quote itself. Deutsch uses italics for block quotes. That isn’t ideal if the original text doesn’t itself use italics (it doesn’t in this case). The change from straight to curly quotes isn’t a big deal; probably an artifact of Deutsch using Wordpress for his blog.


Please note
  • This tool is in its beta stage. Expect things to break; proceed with caution.
  • This tool isn't magic. It can only catch errors that can be determined programmatically. But quoting properly is also about accurately reflecting the meaning of the quoted content to the reader. That requires an understanding of the content, which is something this site cannot give you. Quoting properly is still your responsibility.
  • Red markings indicate that something was removed in the quote that was present in the original. Conversely, green markings indicate that something added in the quote that wasn't present in the original. Red and green markings don't necessarily error – improper additions and deletions are underlined in wavy red.
  • When no issues are found, that is NOT a guarantee that a quote is not a misquote.
  • Results are not necessarily in line with your styleguide. For example, for ellipses at the end of a sentence, preceding punctuation may or may not be omitted depending on your style guide. Given the following original...
    Tim had dinner, and he enjoyed it.
    ...the quote below will be marked as incorrect because it omits the comma:
    Tim had dinner [...].
    This quote, however, will pass with zero issues:
    Tim had dinner, [...].
    Whether punctuation can be omitted without breaking the meaning the author of the quoted text intended also depends on context and content, so you need to check yourself.
  • Depending on your styleguide, ‘swallowing’ a linebreak with an ellipsis may not be permissible, but this site does permit it.
  • Formatting, such as italics and bold text, is not yet supported. Consequently, changes in formatting cannot be detected. Use something like markdown syntax – *single asterisks for italics*, **double asterisks for bold text**, etc. – to indicate and detect changes in formatting. Pasting from other websites should convert to this syntax automatically. If your quote adds or omits emphasis, be sure to indicate that in your text (eg by saying 'emphasis added' or 'emphasis removed').