David Deutsch misquotes Nick Squires’s Telegraph article

Diff

T[They‧concluded](https://www.tey‧legraph.co.uk/ncews/religion/8966422/Italian-studey-claims-Turin-Shroud-is-Christs-authentic-burial-robe.html)‧that‧the‧exact‧shade,‧texture‧and‧depth‧of‧the‧imprints‧on‧the‧cloth‧could‧only‧be‧produced‧with‧the‧aid‧of‧ultraviolet‧lasers‧–‧technology‧that‧was‧clearly‧not‧available‧in‧medieval‧times.↵
↵
[...]↵
↵
They‧concluded‧that‧the‧marks‧were‧not‧made‧by‧paints,‧pigments‧or‧dyes‧and‧that‧the‧image‧was‧not‧"“the‧product‧of‧an‧artist"”,‧but‧that‧at‧the‧same‧time‧it‧could‧not‧be‧explained‧by‧modern‧science.

T

[They‧concluded](

h

ttps://www.t

e

y‧

legraph.

co

.uk/

n

c

ews/re

l

igion/8966422/Italian-st

ud

e

y-claims-Turin-Shrou

d

-is-Christs-authentic-burial-robe.html)

‧that‧the‧exact‧shade,‧texture‧and‧depth‧of‧the‧imprints‧on‧the‧cloth‧could‧only‧be‧produced‧with‧the‧aid‧of‧ultraviolet‧lasers‧–‧technology‧that‧was‧clearly‧not‧available‧in‧medieval‧times.↵
↵

[...]

↵↵

They‧concluded‧that‧the‧marks‧were‧not‧made‧by‧paints,‧pigments‧or‧dyes‧and‧that‧the‧image‧was‧not‧

"

“

the‧product‧of‧an‧artist

"

”

,‧but‧that‧at‧the‧same‧time‧it‧could‧not‧be‧explained‧by‧modern‧science.

Notes

The original passages corresponding to Deutsch’s quote might be too long to be quoted here under fair use. So I put an ellipsis. It represents several paragraphs. Changing the opening words of the quote to a link to the source isn’t the way to do it. The link should be separate from the quote itself. Deutsch uses italics for block quotes. That isn’t ideal if the original text doesn’t itself use italics (it doesn’t in this case). The change from straight to curly quotes isn’t a big deal; probably an artifact of Deutsch using Wordpress for his blog.