‘Deutsch Explains’ misquotes David Deutsch (3)

Feb 24, 2024 · By Dennis Hackethal · Fork · Check another quote

Original text

But, in reality, scientific theories are not ‘derived’ from anything. We do not read them in nature, nor does nature write them into us. They are guesses – bold conjectures. Human minds create them by rearranging, combining, altering and adding to existing ideas with the intention of improving upon them. We do not begin with ‘white paper’ at birth, but with inborn expectations and intentions and an innate ability to improve upon them using thought and experience.

Quote text

Scientific theories are not ‘derived’ from anything. We do not read them in nature, nor does nature write them into us. They are guesses – bold conjectures. Human minds create them by rearranging, combining, altering, and adding to existing ideas with the intention of improving upon them. We do not begin with ‘white paper’ at birth but with inborn expectations and intentions and an innate ability to improve upon them using thought and experience.
No use of ellipsis indicated, falling back to default ‘[...]’ if necessary.

Found 4 issue(s) using regular expression . and Myers algorithm, underlined in wavy red.
But,inreality,sScientifictheoriesarenot‘derived’fromanything.Wedonotreadtheminnature,nordoesnaturewritethemintous.Theyareguessesboldconjectures.Humanmindscreatethembyrearranging,combining,altering,andaddingtoexistingideaswiththeintentionofimprovinguponthem.Wedonotbeginwith‘whitepaper’atbirth,butwithinbornexpectationsandintentionsandaninnateabilitytoimproveuponthemusingthoughtandexperience.

Explanation

# Part Valid? Explanation
1
But,inreality,s
× no Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement].
2
S
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
3
cientifictheoriesarenot‘derived’fromanything.Wedonotreadtheminnature,nordoesnaturewritethemintous.Theyareguessesboldconjectures.Humanmindscreatethembyrearranging,combining,altering
4
,
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
5
andaddingtoexistingideaswiththeintentionofimprovinguponthem.Wedonotbeginwith‘whitepaper’atbirth
6
,
× no Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement].
7
butwithinbornexpectationsandintentionsandaninnateabilitytoimproveuponthemusingthoughtandexperience.

Notes

They’ve made the mistake of omitting something at the beginning of the sentence without indication before, twice. It’s the kind of mistake Deutsch himself would make (eg here and here). So I’m starting to wonder whether Deutsch runs that Twitter account and misquotes himself. The account has his photo and links to his homepage so maybe? But the activity doesn’t match the British timezone...

Embed

Click this button to copy the embed code, then paste it where you want the diff to appear:


Please note
  • This tool is in its beta stage. Expect things to break; proceed with caution.
  • This tool isn't magic. It can only catch errors that can be determined programmatically. But quoting properly is also about accurately reflecting the meaning of the quoted content to the reader. That requires an understanding of the content, which is something this site cannot give you. Quoting properly is still your responsibility.
  • Red markings indicate that something was removed in the quote that was present in the original. Conversely, green markings indicate that something added in the quote that wasn't present in the original. Red and green markings don't necessarily error – improper additions and deletions are underlined in wavy red.
  • When no issues are found, that is NOT a guarantee that a quote is not a misquote.
  • Results are not necessarily in line with your styleguide. For example, for ellipses at the end of a sentence, preceding punctuation may or may not be omitted depending on your style guide. Given the following original...
    Tim had dinner, and he enjoyed it.
    ...the quote below will be marked as incorrect because it omits the comma:
    Tim had dinner [...].
    This quote, however, will pass with zero issues:
    Tim had dinner, [...].
    Whether punctuation can be omitted without breaking the meaning the author of the quoted text intended also depends on context and content, so you need to check yourself.
  • Depending on your styleguide, ‘swallowing’ a linebreak with an ellipsis may not be permissible, but this site does permit it.
  • Formatting, such as italics and bold text, is not yet supported. Consequently, changes in formatting cannot be detected. Use something like markdown syntax – *single asterisks for italics*, **double asterisks for bold text**, etc. – to indicate and detect changes in formatting. Pasting from other websites should convert to this syntax automatically. If your quote adds or omits emphasis, be sure to indicate that in your text (eg by saying 'emphasis added' or 'emphasis removed').