Elliot Temple (‘curi’) misquotes David Deutsch again

Apr 16, 2025 · By Dennis Hackethal · Fork · Check another quote

Original text

A conspiracy theory is an explanation of observed events in current affairs and history … which alleges that those events were planned and caused in secret by powerful (or allegedly powerful) conspirators, who thereby… benefit at the expense of others, and who therefore… lie, and suppress evidence, about their secret actions, and… lie about the motives for their public actions.

Quote text

A conspiracy theory is ▪ an explanation of observed events in current affairs and history … which ▪ alleges that those events were planned and caused in secret by powerful (or ▪ allegedly powerful) conspirators, who thereby… ▪ benefit at the expense of others, and who therefore… ▪ lie, and suppress evidence, about their secret actions, and… ▪ lie about the motives for their public actions.
Ellipsis used (if any): ‘[...]’

Found 6 issue(s) using regular expression . and Myers algorithm, underlined in wavy red.
Aconspiracytheoryis↵
↵
anexplanationofobservedeventsincurrentaffairsandhistorywhich↵
↵
allegesthatthoseeventswereplannedandcausedinsecretbypowerful(or↵

↵

▪allegedlypowerful)conspirators,whothereby…↵
↵
benefitattheexpenseofothers,andwhotherefore…↵
↵
lie,andsuppressevidence,abouttheirsecretactions,and…↵
↵
lieaboutthemotivesfortheirpublicactions.

Explanation

# Part Valid? Explanation
1
Aconspiracytheoryis↵
↵
2
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
3
anexplanationofobservedeventsincurrentaffairsandhistorywhich↵
↵
4
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
5
allegesthatthoseeventswereplannedandcausedinsecretbypowerful(or
6
↵
↵
▪
× no Insertions cannot contain linebreaks.
7
allegedlypowerful)conspirators,whothereby…↵
↵
8
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
9
benefitattheexpenseofothers,andwhotherefore…↵
↵
10
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
11
lie,andsuppressevidence,abouttheirsecretactions,and…↵
↵
12
× no Insertions must be surrounded by [brackets].
13
lieaboutthemotivesfortheirpublicactions.

Notes

Temple introduces list markers where the original source has none. He also splits a single list item into two because he uncritically copied the line break from the original PDF. After checking that quote, I briefly skimmed the rest of Temple’s article (literally only about 5 seconds of effort). The article contains more mistakes that aren’t misquotes. For example, he writes “companies like DuPont)” where the closing parenthesis should be part of the link. As a result, the link is broken. He also writes “many people were't keeping quiet” (typo “were't”). Again, I haven’t read the rest, but my instinctual guess is that Temple is trying to preemptively address criticisms he might receive because I called him out on a false conspiracy theory of his (see here and here) and he needs to make it work somehow. Another ~10 seconds of effort revealed a paragraph that sound like he thinks of himself as brave for resisting my legal complaint after he defamed me (he specifically links to an article about me and that issue in that same paragraph).

Embed

Click this button to copy the embed code, then paste it where you want the diff to appear:


Please note
  • This tool is in its beta stage. Expect things to break; proceed with caution.
  • This tool isn't magic. It can only catch errors that can be determined programmatically. But quoting properly is also about accurately reflecting the meaning of the quoted content to the reader. That requires an understanding of the content, which is something this site cannot give you. Quoting properly is still your responsibility.
  • Red markings indicate that something was removed in the quote that was present in the original. Conversely, green markings indicate that something added in the quote that wasn't present in the original. Red and green markings don't necessarily error – improper additions and deletions are underlined in wavy red.
  • When no issues are found, that is NOT a guarantee that a quote is not a misquote.
  • Results are not necessarily in line with your styleguide. For example, for ellipses at the end of a sentence, preceding punctuation may or may not be omitted depending on your style guide. Given the following original...
    Tim had dinner, and he enjoyed it.
    ...the quote below will be marked as incorrect because it omits the comma:
    Tim had dinner [...].
    This quote, however, will pass with zero issues:
    Tim had dinner, [...].
    Whether punctuation can be omitted without breaking the meaning the author of the quoted text intended also depends on context and content, so you need to check yourself.
  • Depending on your styleguide, ‘swallowing’ a linebreak with an ellipsis may not be permissible, but this site does permit it.
  • Formatting, such as italics and bold text, is not yet supported. Consequently, changes in formatting cannot be detected. Use something like markdown syntax – *single asterisks for italics*, **double asterisks for bold text**, etc. – to indicate and detect changes in formatting. Pasting from other websites should convert to this syntax automatically. If your quote adds or omits emphasis, be sure to indicate that in your text (eg by saying 'emphasis added' or 'emphasis removed').