Walker Scribd vs Walker Kindle re biological functions

In-house rules Nov 01, 2024 · By Dennis Hackethal · Forked from Walker Scribd vs Walker Kindle re cancer risk

Misquote: 1 issue found

Unmarked changes are underlined in wavy red. Hover over themTap them or see the explanation below. Checked using the pattern . and the Myers algorithm.

Suggested fix

The quote with each unmarked change either marked or undone. It passes the check.

Based on a rich, new scientific understanding of sleep, we no longer have to ask what sleep is good for. Instead, we are now forced to wonder whether there are any biological functions that do not benefit by a good night’s sleep. [...]

Original text

Based on a rich, new scientific understanding of sleep, we no longer have to ask what sleep is good for. Instead, we are now forced to wonder whether there are any biological functions that do not benefit by a good night’s sleep. So far, the results of thousands of studies insist that no, there aren’t.

Quote text

Based on a rich, new scientific understanding of sleep, we no longer have to ask what sleep is good for. Instead, we are now forced to wonder whether there are any biological functions that do not benefit by a good night’s sleep.

No use of ellipsis indicated, falling back to default ‘[...]’ if necessary.

Diff

Based‧on‧a‧rich,‧new‧scientific‧understanding‧of‧sleep,‧we‧no‧longer‧have‧to‧ask‧what‧sleep‧is‧good‧for.‧Instead,‧we‧are‧now‧forced‧to‧wonder‧whether‧there‧are‧any‧biological‧functions‧that‧do‧*not*‧benefit‧by‧a‧good‧night’s‧sleep.‧So‧far,‧the‧results‧of‧thousands‧of‧studies‧insist‧that‧no,‧there‧aren’t.

added in the quote ~~removed~~ from the original wavy not marked as a change ‧ space

Part-by-part explanation

#	Part	Valid?	Explanation
1	Based‧on‧a‧rich,‧new‧scientific‧understanding‧of‧sleep,‧we‧no‧longer‧have‧to‧ask‧what‧sleep‧is‧good‧for.‧Instead,‧we‧are‧now‧forced‧to‧wonder‧whether‧there‧are‧any‧biological‧functions‧that‧do‧not‧benefit‧by‧a‧good‧night’s‧sleep.
2	~~‧So‧far,‧the‧results‧of‧thousands‧of‧studies‧insist‧that‧no,‧there‧aren’t.~~	× no	Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement].

Part

Valid?

Explanation

Based‧on‧a‧rich,‧new‧scientific‧understanding‧of‧sleep,‧we‧no‧longer‧have‧to‧ask‧what‧sleep‧is‧good‧for.‧Instead,‧we‧are‧now‧forced‧to‧wonder‧whether‧there‧are‧any‧biological‧functions‧that‧do‧*not*‧benefit‧by‧a‧good‧night’s‧sleep.

‧So‧far,‧the‧results‧of‧thousands‧of‧studies‧insist‧that‧no,‧there‧aren’t.

× no

Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement].

Embed this check

Paste this snippet into your site or blog to show the diff where you quote.

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://quote-checker.com/diffs/walker-scribd-vs-walker-kindle-re-biological-functions/embed.js"></script>

Please note: limitations of this tool